[Hiring] Sports Content Reviewer @Gramian Consulting Group

Role Description

We are looking for an experienced Sports Content Reviewer to support the quality assurance of data used to evaluate Large Language Models. The role involves:

• Reviewing sports-related prompts and completed tasks.
• Assessing factual accuracy, reasoning quality, completeness, and guideline compliance.
• Providing clear, evidence-based feedback to contributors.

The work may cover:

• Global sports
• Professional leagues
• Athletes
• Competitions
• Rules
• Statistics
• Sports history
• Analytics
• Training principles
• Related developments across different sporting disciplines

CONTRACT: Contractor assignment, 8 weeks

COMMITMENT: Full-time, 40 hours per week with at least 4 hours of PST overlap

LOCATIONS: Remote - Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Egypt, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Turkey, Vietnam

PROCESS: Initial screening followed by domain manager review

Qualifications

• Master’s degree or higher in Sports Management, Sports Science, Kinesiology, Exercise Science, Physical Education, or a closely related discipline.
• At least 3 years of professional, research, teaching, or industry experience in a sports-related field.
• Strong knowledge of sports rules, competitions, statistics, history, performance, or analytics.
• Experience reviewing, evaluating, editing, or quality-checking academic or domain-specific content.
• Excellent written English communication skills.

Requirements

• Ability to identify factual, logical, statistical, chronological, and contextual errors.

Key Responsibilities

• Review and validate sports-focused prompts across a broad range of disciplines and topics.
• Evaluate completed tasks for factual accuracy, reasoning quality, completeness, and relevance.
• Verify claims related to athletes, leagues, tournaments, rules, statistics, records, and sports history.
• Identify factual errors, hallucinations, outdated information, logical inconsistencies, and weak annotations.
• Assess whether prompts are sufficiently challenging and aligned with project objectives.
• Ensure compliance with project instructions, annotation standards, and review guidelines.
• Provide clear, constructive, and evidence-based feedback to contributors.
• Maintain consistency across reviews and document quality findings.
• Escalate ambiguous or complex cases when required.
• Collaborate with project managers and AI teams to improve evaluation and quality-review processes.