[Hiring] National Correspondent, Science @The New York Times
Back to Remote jobs   >   Writing   >   science editor
National Correspondent, Science @The New York Times
Writing
Salary usd 124,979.94 ..
Remote Location
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ USA Only
Employment Type full-time
Posted 2wks ago

[Hiring] National Correspondent, Science @The New York Times

2wks ago - The New York Times is hiring a remote National Correspondent, Science. πŸ’Έ Salary: usd 124,979.94 - 160,000 per year πŸ“Location: USA

Role Description

The Science desk of the New York Times is looking for a creative, energetic reporter to cover scientific research in America. We’re looking for someone who can tap and cultivate a large and diverse network of sources in order to bring us stories that capture the excitement and human stakes of scientific discovery at a tumultuous moment in American history:

  • Major investments and funding cuts
  • Rising and falling academic stars
  • A.I.’s growing influence
  • Intensifying competition with China
  • The personalities and pressures behind pathbreaking research
  • Disputes over authorship and academic integrity

The ideal candidate will be an elegant writer with a mastery of narrative writing as well as news and explanatory pieces, and possess a proven ability to translate complex subjects for a general audience. This is a remote position based in the U.S. and will require extensive travel.

Responsibilities:

  • File frequently at a range of lengths and forms β€” news, explainers, features β€” and participate in formats like visual explainers and video.
  • Write clear, concise, and engaging stories that pull in readers while adhering to standards and style guidelines.
  • Use established and develop additional sources to land exclusive stories to cover this beat authoritatively.
  • Monitor news and deliver a steady stream of story ideas that help explain the beat.
  • Collaborate with colleagues across the newsroom.
  • Demonstrate support and understanding of our value of journalistic independence and a strong commitment to our mission to seek the truth and help people understand the world.

This role reports to a Science editor.

Qualifications

  • 7+ years of journalism experience
  • Experience writing about complex subjects with elegance, sensitivity and fairness

Requirements

  • Experience working as a reporter in high-pressure, deadline-driven newsrooms
  • A strong understanding of Times style and standards
  • A willingness to be flexible as the newsroom's needs evolve

Benefits

  • Annual base pay range: $124,979.94 β€” $160,000 USD
  • Eligible for variable pay, such as an annual bonus and restricted stock
  • Medical, dental and vision benefits
  • Flexible Spending Accounts (F.S.A.s)
  • Company-matching 401(k) plan
  • Paid vacation
  • Paid sick days
  • Paid parental leave
  • Tuition reimbursement
  • Professional development programs
Before You Apply
️
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Be aware of the location restriction for this remote position: USA Only
β€Ό Beware of scams! When applying for jobs, you should NEVER have to pay anything. Learn more.
Back to Remote jobs   >   Writing   >   science editor
National Correspondent, Science @The New York Times
Writing
Salary usd 124,979.94 ..
Remote Location
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ USA Only
Employment Type full-time
Posted 2wks ago
Apply for this position
Did not apply βœ“
Applied βœ“
Sent Follow-Up βœ“
Interview Scheduled βœ“
Interview Completed βœ“
Offer Accepted βœ“
Offer Declined βœ“
Application Denied βœ“
Unlock 160,000+ Remote Jobs
️
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Be aware of the location restriction for this remote position: USA Only
β€Ό Beware of scams! When applying for jobs, you should NEVER have to pay anything. Learn more.
Apply for this position
Did not apply βœ“
Applied βœ“
Sent Follow-Up βœ“
Interview Scheduled βœ“
Interview Completed βœ“
Offer Accepted βœ“
Offer Declined βœ“
Application Denied βœ“
Unlock 160,000+ Remote Jobs
Γ—

Apply to the best remote jobs
before everyone else

Access 160,000+ vetted remote jobs and get daily alerts.

4.9 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… from 500+ reviews
Unlock All Jobs Now

Maybe later