[Hiring] Psychology & Counseling Expert @Gramian Consulting Group

Role Description

We are looking for experienced professionals in psychology, social work, counseling, communication, qualitative research, HCI, conflict resolution, or related advisory disciplines to support an AI conversation-evaluation project. The role involves:

• Reviewing conversations between people and AI systems.
• Assessing whether the AI gathered enough context before offering recommendations.
• Identifying important missing information and proposing relevant follow-up questions.
• Distinguishing between critical context and non-essential details.
• Providing structured feedback to improve the quality of AI-assisted conversations.

CONTRACT: Contractor assignment, 9 weeks

COMMITMENT: Full-time, 40 hours per week with at least 4 hours of PST overlap

LOCATIONS: Remote - Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Egypt, Ghana, India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Turkey, or Vietnam

PROCESS: short online test and delivery review

Qualifications

• One of the following academic or professional backgrounds:
• MSW with LCSW or an equivalent social-work license.
• MA/MS with LMFT, LPC, LCPC, or an equivalent counseling license.
• PhD or PsyD in Clinical, Counseling, Social, or Industrial-Organizational Psychology.
• MA or PhD in HCI, Communication, Anthropology, Sociology, Conflict Resolution, Qualitative Research, or a closely related field.
• Relevant professional credential combined with at least 5 years of direct advisory, coaching, mediation, consulting, or client-facing experience.
• At least 3 years of relevant professional practice, with 5+ years preferred for credential-based applicants.
• Experience gathering missing context through interviews, assessments, consultations, or advisory conversations.
• Ability to distinguish critical information from non-essential context.
• Strong written English and qualitative analytical skills.
• Strong attention to detail and ability to follow detailed labeling guidelines.

Requirements

• Conduct structured qualitative reviews using defined evaluation guidelines.
• Document findings clearly in spreadsheets, annotation tools, or labeling platforms.
• Apply consistent judgment across cases and flag ambiguous examples.
• Collaborate with research and quality teams to improve evaluation standards.
• Participate in calibration and quality-review activities.